Вопросы пропаданцам

Еще раз - школа тхеравады отрицает реальность прошлого и будущего далее одного непосредственного мгновения.

Я вам говорю, что у женщины, рожденной в благополучной семье, рождение лучше, чем у мужчины, выросшего в детдоме

Из этого следует, что все те, кто, как минимум, не буддист попадут в нижние миры, или я неверно всё понял?

Рената Скот

Это почти дно, да.
Продолжайте.
До встречи в аду

Во-вторых, согласно буддизму, самое лучшее, что может случиться с существом - встреча с Учением.

рождение лучше

может привести

[59] S.— Is it wrong to say ‘ the past exists,’ ‘ the future
exists ’?
TA.— Yes.
1 4 0 . Appeals to Authority 9 5
[59] S.— Is it wrong to say ‘ the past exists,’ ‘ the future
exists ’?
TA.— Yes.
S.— But was it not said by the Exalted One : ‘ What
soever material quality, bhikkhus, whether past, future,
or present, is either internal or external, gross or subtle,
common or excellent, distant or near, is called the material
aggregate. Whatsoever feeling, whether past, futui'c, or
present, o f which the foregomg may be said, is termed the
aggregate o f feeling. So also are the other three aggregates ’ ?*
Surely then the past exists, the future exists.
[60] Th. — But was it not said by the Exalted One:
‘ These three modes in u'ord, tenn, or name, bhikkhus, which
have been distinct in the past, ore now distinct, and ivill be
distinct, are not condemned by recluses and brahmins who are
wise. Which three? (1) Thatmatcrial aggregate which is past,
which has ceased, which is changed, is I'cckoned, termed, named
“ has been it is not reckoned as “ exists,” nor as “ will be.”
And so fo r the aggi'cgates of feeling, perception, mental co
efficients, consciousness. (2) That material aggiegate ivhich
is not yet born, and. which has not appeared, is reckoned,
termed, named “ will be,” but is not reckoned as “ exists,”
nor as “ has been.” And so fo r the mental aggregates.
(3) That material body ivhich has come to birth, has appeared,
is reckoned, teiined, named “ exists,” but is not reckoned as
“ has been,” nor as “ will be.” And so fo r the mental aggre
gates. Verily these three modes in word, term, or name, bhik
khus, are distinct, have been distinct in the past, are not,
will not, he condemned by recluses and brahmins tvho arc
wise.
‘ Bhikkhus, the folk o f Ukkala, Lenten speakers o f old,*
Casualists, Deniers o f the Deed, Sceptics— even they, too,
judged that these three inodes o f reckoning, terming, or naming,
should not be condemned or repmliated. And, why was that ?■
Because they were afraid o f blame, o f tmpoptdarity, o f incur
ring opposition ’ ?

У вас не благополучная семья. Вас даже с людьми разговаривать не научили. Чисто туземец одел часы ролекс и тут же стал благополучным средним классом в США, ага.