Возвращаясь к разговору о методологии буддизма...

С мирской т.з. является существующим - действительным - випраюкта-санскарой.

Так воздается только делам, действиям и мыслям, а не кому-то. Тот так и так не существует реально

Так воздается только делам, действиям и мыслям, а не кому-то. Тот так и так не существует реально, какое ему дело до какого воздаяния (пратинияма), которое к тому же не связано с умом (читта-випраюкта).

‘Tapassi, how many actions does Niganthanaataputta declare for doing demerit and its perpetration?’‘Friend Gotama, it is not the practise to say action, it is the practise to say punishment’.’Tapassi, how many punishments does Niganthanataputta declare for doing demerit and its perpetration?’ ‘Friend, Gotama, Niganthanataputta has declared three punishments for doing demerit and its perpetration. They are bodily punishment, verbal punishment and mental punishment’. ‘Tapassi, is bodily punishment one, verbal punishment another and mental punishment another?’ ‘Friend, Gotama, bodily punishment is one, verbal punishment is another and mental punishment is another’. ‘Tapassi these three punishments different and dissected, which one does Niganthanataputta declare as the most blameworthy? Is it bodily, verbal or mental punishment?’ ‘Friend Gotama, of these three punishments that are different and dissected, Niganthanataputta declares bodily punishment as the most blameworthy, for doing demerit and its perpetration not so much verbal and mental punishments’. ‘Does Tapassi say bodily punishment?’ ‘Friend Gotama, I say bodily punishment’. ‘Does Tapassi say bodily punishment?’ ‘Friend Gotama, I say bodily punishment’. ‘Does Tapassi say bodily punishment?’ ‘Friend Gotama, I say bodily punishment’. Thus the Blessed One made Dighatapassi to be established in this argument up to the third time.

Then Dighatapasssi said to the Blessed One: ‘Friend Gotama, how many punishments do you declare for doing demerit and its perpetration?’ ‘Friend, Tapassi, it is not the practise of the Thus Gone One to say punishment, it is the practise to say,action.’‘Friend Gotama, how many actions do you declare for doing demerit and its perpetration?’. ‘Tapassi, I declare three actions for doing demerit and its perpetration. They are bodily, verbal and mental actions.’ ‘Friend, Gotama, is bodily action one, verbal action another and mental action another?’ ‘Friend, Gotama, of these three actions that are different and dissected, which one does good Gotama declare as most blameworthy? Is it bodily, verbal or mental actions?’ ‘Friend Tapassi, of these three actions, I declare mental action as the most blameworthy, not so much bodily or verbal action.’ ‘Does friend Gotama say mental action?’ ‘Tapassi, I say mental action.’ ‘Does friend Gotama say mental action?’ ‘Tapassi, I say, mental action.’ ‘Does friend Gotama say, mental action?’ ‘Tapassi, I say, mental action.’Thus Dighatapassi made the Blessed One to be established in this argument up to the third time, got up from his seat and approached Niganthanataputta.
-- http://zencomp.com/greatwisdom/ebud/majjhima/056-upali-e1.htm